Legal Opinion

Zeigler v. Constitution State Service Co.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 1, 1993No. 679PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The issue in this appeal is whether occupants of a vehicle which is neither insured nor registered in Pennsylvania are entitled to recover benefits under the Pennsylvania Assigned Claims Plan for injuries received when the vehicle collided with another uninsured vehicle in Philadelphia. The trial court held that the occupants were eligible for such benefits. After careful review, we reverse.

On August 7, 1988, an uninsured and unregistered motor vehicle operated by Anthony Edwards collided with an uninsured vehicle owned by Carol Porter and operated by Crestón Gregory. Clinton…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan v. EnglishSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Rosado v. Constitution State Service Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Bridges v. GarySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Hodges v. RodriguezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. Hester v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims ACPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Hester v. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims ACPSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. Ortiz v. GambleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API