Ortiz v. Gamble
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
MONTEMURO, J.:
¶ 1 Appellant appeals from the entry of summary judgment in favor of the Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan (“the Plan”). We vacate and remand.
A motion for summary judgment may properly be granted when the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there are no genuine issues of material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.
Hopewell Estates, Inc. v. Kent, 435 Pa.Super. 471, 646 A.2d 1192, 1194 (1994).
When determining if a trial court…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Merriweather v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Hodges v. RodriguezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Hopewell Estates, Inc. v. KentSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Borough of Mifflinburg v. HeimSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.