Legal Opinion

Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan v. English

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 28, 1993No. 00214PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUDOCK, Judge:

At issue in the present appeal is whether the Assigned Claims Plan (the Plan), 75 Pa.C.S. §§ 1751-1757,1 of the Motor Vehicle Financial Responsibility Law (MVFRL), 75 Pa.C.S. § 1702, et seq., must continue to provide uninsured motorist benefits to occupants of uninsured vehicles in light of the recent amendments to the MVFRL (Act 6).2 For the reasons stated below, we find that the Plan is not required to provide such coverage, and, therefore, reverse the order of the trial court.

The facts of this case are simple: Maria English (English) was injured while a passenger3 in an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vogel v. BerkleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Keystone Automated Equipment Co. v. Reliance InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Township of Derry v. SwartzCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  4. Jackson v. Travelers InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Odd Fellows Home of Pennsylvania v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Financial Responsibility Assigned Claims Plan v. EnglishSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Hodges v. RodriguezSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  3. General Acc. Ins. Co. of America v. ParkerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Gunter v. Constitution State Service Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Nationwide Insurance v. CalhounSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API