Legal Opinion
Sullivan v. Town of Brookline
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided August 21, 2000No. 98-P-1976PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDrbben, J.
In August, 1977, the plaintiff, a patrolman in the town of Brookline, was granted an accidental disability retirement pursuant to G. L. c. 32, § 7. He sought reinstatement in September, 1997, under G. L. c. 32, § 8. After examination and issuance of a certificate by a medical panel, approval of the medical panel certificate by the Public Employee Retirement Administration Commission (PERAC), and transmission by the Brookline retirement board of the panel’s certificate to the *17town’s police chief for appropriate action (reinstatement), the police chief declined to reinstate the plaintiff. The…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- O'Neill v. City ManagerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- White v. City of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
- Balcam v. Town of HinghamMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1996
- Brooks v. Architectural Barriers BoardMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1982
3Cited by4 opinions
- Sullivan v. Town of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Noonan v. Public Employee Retirement Administration CommissionMassachusetts Superior Court · 2002
- Curtis v. City of FitchburgMassachusetts Superior Court · 2003
- Noorigian v. Woburn Police DepartmentMassachusetts Superior Court · 2001