Legal Opinion

Balcam v. Town of Hingham

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided September 5, 1996No. 94-P-1343PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLenk, J.

The defendants appeal from a Superior Court order granting the plaintiffs’ request for a mandatory preliminary injunction. The defendants appealed to a single justice of the Appeals Court pursuant to G. L. c. 231, § 118, par. 1, and Mass.RA.P. 6(a), 378 Mass. 930 (1979), who stayed the preliminary injunction pending appeal to a panel of this court. *261We now review the Superior Court judge’s decision pursuant to c. 231, § 118, par. 2, under an abuse of discretion standard, Biotti v. Selectmen of Manchester, 25 Mass. App. Ct. 637, 640 (1988), subjecting the judge’s conclusions of law to “broad…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Packaging Industries Group, Inc. v. CheneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. Mass. CrincMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  3. East Chop Tennis Club v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
  4. Lovequist v. Conservation Commission of DennisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  5. Ferrante v. Board of Appeals of NorthamptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Milo M.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  2. Abbott v. VirussoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
  3. City of Somerville v. Somerville Municipal Employees Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
  4. Commonwealth v. BlairMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
  5. Friedman v. Conservation CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API