Balcam v. Town of Hingham
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the CourtLenk, J.
The defendants appeal from a Superior Court order granting the plaintiffs’ request for a mandatory preliminary injunction. The defendants appealed to a single justice of the Appeals Court pursuant to G. L. c. 231, § 118, par. 1, and Mass.RA.P. 6(a), 378 Mass. 930 (1979), who stayed the preliminary injunction pending appeal to a panel of this court. *261We now review the Superior Court judge’s decision pursuant to c. 231, § 118, par. 2, under an abuse of discretion standard, Biotti v. Selectmen of Manchester, 25 Mass. App. Ct. 637, 640 (1988), subjecting the judge’s conclusions of law to “broad…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Packaging Industries Group, Inc. v. CheneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Commonwealth v. Mass. CrincMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
- East Chop Tennis Club v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
- Lovequist v. Conservation Commission of DennisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Ferrante v. Board of Appeals of NorthamptonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1962
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Commonwealth v. Milo M.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
- Abbott v. VirussoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2007
- City of Somerville v. Somerville Municipal Employees Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
- Commonwealth v. BlairMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
- Friedman v. Conservation CommissionMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.