Miller v. Hogeboom
Nebraska Supreme Court
Error from the district court of Sarpy county. Tried below before Ambrose, J. An officer relying upon an offer of reward may be entitled to it when making an arrest under circumstances which do not require him to make the arrest as an official duty. (Hayden v. Sougcr, 56 Ind. 42; Davis v. Munson, 43 Vt. 676; Easting v. Morris, 71 Tex. 584.)
1Opinion of the Court
Ragan, C.
In the county court of Sarpy county Richard Hogeboom sued Frank D. Miller. Hogeboom had judgment, and Miller appealed to the district court of said county, Upjohn and Catherine Miller becoming the sureties on his appeal bond. In the district court Hogeboom alleged in his petition that being the owner of a pocketbook containing seme $395 in money and some papers of little value he lost the same; that the said pocketbook and contents were found by a man named James Sullivan, who resided at Ilogeboom’s house; that Sullivan concealed the fact of his having; found said pocketbook and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Beemis v. WylieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865
- Foster v. Minnesota Central Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
- Small v. SandallNebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Harold v. Moline, Milburn & Stoddard Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1895
- Means v. HendershottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Board of Commissioners v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
- People v. DruryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1928
- Keehn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1924