Legal Opinion · Dissent

Keehn v. United States

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided July 18, 1924No. 1721Published

1DissentAnderson, Circuit Judge

In the opinion and decision of the majority I cannot concur. The question is of minor importance in the practical administration of the Prohibition Act, but of much importance in its relation to the security of persons and homes, under the spirit as well as the letter of the Fourth Amendment.

In Park v. United States (C. C. A.) 294 Fed. 776, 790, I was constrained to protest against the extension of police powers “by judicial ruling, not by congressional enactment, at a time when the task of organizing and maintaining an honest, law-abiding, and generally competent police force is infinitely…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Gouled v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Amos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. United States v. HartwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1868

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API