Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Geyer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 15, 1987No. 49 M.D. Appeal Dkt. 1985PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDermott,1 justice.

The controversy in this appeal centers on whether an antenuptial agreement between the appellant, Rosalie Geyer, nee Werner, and her deceased husband, George W. Geyer, precludes her from exercising her statutory right to take against his will.2

The appellant and the decedent met in October, 1976. Each had been twice married and widowed. A whirlwind romance ensued. Mr. Geyer soon expressed his interest in marriage, but the appellant was reluctant to marry a third time. Nevertheless she eventually consented to the union and the couple married on January 9, 1977.

In January of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. McClellan EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. McHugh v. McHughSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  3. Hillegass EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. Kaufmann EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Gelb EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Simeone v. SimeoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Stoner v. StonerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Simeone v. SimeoneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Nigro v. NigroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. In Re Estate of HartmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API