Legal Opinion · Dissent

Parr-Richmond Industrial Corp. v. Boyd

California Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1954No. S. F. 18625, 18626Published

1DissentCarter, J.

I dissent.

It appears that the plaintiff taxpayer should have first pursued his remedy before the board of supervisors sitting as a local board of equalization before court action and in such action the court is limited to a review of the evidence before the board.

The factual situation should first be clarified. The majority opinion indicates that this is a case where taxes were assessed against property plaintiff did not own. That is not the case. Taxes on real property are not assessed against a person. They are assessed against the property. Property may be *170assessed to an unknown owner.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Universal Consolidated Oil Co. v. ByramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Security-First National Bank v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. MundoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Brenner v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API