Parr-Richmond Industrial Corp. v. Boyd
California Supreme Court
1DissentCarter, J.
I dissent.
It appears that the plaintiff taxpayer should have first pursued his remedy before the board of supervisors sitting as a local board of equalization before court action and in such action the court is limited to a review of the evidence before the board.
The factual situation should first be clarified. The majority opinion indicates that this is a case where taxes were assessed against property plaintiff did not own. That is not the case. Taxes on real property are not assessed against a person. They are assessed against the property. Property may be *170assessed to an unknown owner.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Los Angeles Gas & Electric Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Universal Consolidated Oil Co. v. ByramCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Security-First National Bank v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. MundoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Brenner v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.