Legal Opinion
Skinner v. Northrop Grumman Retirement Plan B
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 16, 2012No. 10-55161PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GOODWIN, Circuit Judge:
Appellants Charles Skinner and Gregory Stratton appeal summary judgment rejecting their claims under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
I. Facts and procedural history
Appellants were employees of Litton Industries, Inc., and participated in its retirement plan, which was called Litton Industries, Inc., Retirement Plan B (“Litton Plan B”). Following corporate mergers and plan modifications, Appellants sued the successor corporation, Northrop Grumman, and Northrop Grumman…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- CIGNA Corp. v. AmaraSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Neil Bergt v. The Retirement Plan for Pilots Employed by Markair, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Eijinio Banuelos v. Construction Laborers' Trust Funds for Southern CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- American President Lines, Ltd., Appellee/cross-Appellant v. United States, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- The Continental Insurance Company of New York, New York, a Corporation v. Richard B. CottenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Randy Pearce v. Chrysler Grp. LLC Pension PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2018
- Geoffrey Moyle v. Liberty Mutual Retirement PlanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Gabriel v. Alaska Electrical Pension FundCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Amara v. CIGNA Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- Sandra Peters v. Aetna IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.