Legal Opinion

Republic Acceptance Corp. v. Bennett

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 2, 1922No. Docket No. 28PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

The plaintiff, a foreign corporation with its home office at Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, as successor to the Republic Mortgage Company, brings this suit to recover on three contracts of guaranty of certain securities executed by defendants. . The defense raised was that the failure of the mortgage company, hereafter spoken of as the plaintiff, to comply with the statutes of this State requiring such corporations to take out a State license, pay a franchise fee, etc., barred its recovery. The trial judge so found and directed a verdict for defendants.

There is little dispute about the facts. The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hooper v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Vaughn Machine Co. v. LighthouseAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  3. Neyens v. WorthingtonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Rex Beach Pictures Co. v. Harry I. Garson ProductionsMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  5. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of Baltimore v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1913

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Malooly v. York Heating & Ventilating Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Booker v. Old Dominion Land Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  3. Hemphill v. OrloffMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Gross Income Tax Division v. BartlettIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Westerlin & Campbell Co. v. Detroit Milling Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API