Legal Opinion
Westerlin & Campbell Co. v. Detroit Milling Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided December 22, 1925No. Docket No. 75PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.
Plaintiff is an Illinois corporation which has not complied with the provisions of part 5, chap. 1, Act No. 84, Pub. Acts 1921 (Comp. Laws Supp. 1922, § 9053 [164-168]). It entered into a contract at Chicago with defendant to sell it a refrigerating machine of the York type to be shipped to defendant at Adrian f. o. b. Chicago. The contract provided for the furnishing of an erecting engineer at the option of defendant; his services and expenses to be paid for by defendant. The machine was shipped and was installed. Half of the purchase price has been paid and this bill is filed to foreclose…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Browning v. City of WaycrossSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Caldwell v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- York Manufacturing Co. v. ColleySupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Rearick v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Dozier v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lake States Engineering Corp. v. Lawrence Seaway Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1969
- Transit Bus Sales v. Kalamazoo Coaches, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
- Moline Furniture Works v. Club Holding Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
- Vander Horst v. Kalamazoo Apartments Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1927
- Berk v. Gordon Johnson CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.