Legal Opinion

State ex rel. McGonegle v. Indus. Comm.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1996No. 1994-1689PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 76 Ohio St.3d 272.] THE STATE EX REL. MCGONEGLE, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. McGonegle v. Indus. Comm.,

1996-Ohio-162.] Workers’ compensation—Fact that a claimant has been fired for a reason unrelated to an allowed condition has no bearing on claimant’s eligibility for wage loss compensation, when. __________________ The fact that a claimant has been fired for a reason unrelated to an allowed condition has no bearing on a claimant’s eligibility for wage loss compensation,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Watts v. Schottenstein Stores Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State ex rel. McGonegle v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State ex rel. McCoy v. Dedicated Transport, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State ex rel. Smith v. Superior's Brand Meats, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Stafford v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API