United States ex rel. Howard v. KBR, Inc.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Michael M. Mihm, United States District Judge
Now before the Court is KBR, Inc. and Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.’s (collectively referred to as “KBR” or “Defendants”)1 Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 38) filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). For the reasons set forth below, KBR’s Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 38) is DENIED.
JURISDICTION
This Court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 as the claims asserted in the Complaint present federal questions under the False Claims Act (“FCA”) as amended 31 U.S.C. § 3729, et seq. This court has…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Swanson v. Citibank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Concentra Health Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
- Lisa Williamson v. Mark Curran, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Dyncorp International, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017