Seaboard Coastline Railroad v. Hughes
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HENRY, Justice.
The sole question before this Court is whether a railroad conductor is a “managing agent” within the purview of Rule 26.-04(2) Tennessee Rules of Civil Procedure. Certiorari was granted in order that this Court might formulate guidelines for making this determination and apply them to this case. Our broad objective, however, was to render a definitive opinion, for the guidance of the bench and bar, in a procedural area wherein this Court has not spoken.
I
We narrate the factual situation only to the extent necessary to form a predicate for the opinion.
This civil action is…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- June T. Inc. v. Arnold Ray KingCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
- James Hosie v. Chicago and North Western Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1960
- Krauss v. Erie R. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Phelps v. Magnavox Company of TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1972
- Newark Insurance v. SartainDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1957
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Vythoulkas v. Vanderbilt University HospitalCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985
- Wallace v. Knoxville's Community Development Corp.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1978
- Mayor of Baltimore v. AustinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978
- Billy K. Pomeroy v. Illinois Central Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2005
- Vythoulkas v. Vanderbilt University HospitalCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1985