Legal Opinion
Rural Wtr Dist No 2 Creek Cnty v. City of Glenpool
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided October 30, 2012No. 11-5154PublishedCited by 74 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDOCK, Circuit Judge.
Congress enacted 7 U.S.C. § 1926(b) as part of a federal statutory scheme to extend loans and grants to certain associations providing water service to farmers, ranchers, and other rural residents. Section 1926(b) prohibits other water utilities from encroaching upon services provided by federally indebted water associations. Plaintiff, Rural Water District No. 2 Creek County, Oklahoma, a rural water provider covered by § 1926(b), and Defendant Glenpool Utility Services Authority, a public trust created to provide water service, and its beneficiary, Defendant City of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- David Holt, as Personal Representative of the Estates of James W. Holt and Joan Holt, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Southern New England Telephone Co. v. Global NAPs Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
- Louie Morris, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. City of Hobart, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
- Muscogee (Creek) Nation v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- Dutcher v. MathesonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- Denver Homeless Out Loud v. Denver, ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2022
- Dutcher v. MathesonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- New Mexico v. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- SFF-TIR, LLC v. StephensonDistrict Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2017
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.