Legal Opinion
Lord v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided June 20, 1983No. 50-80CPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*751OPINION
ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WHITE, Senior Judge.
The present cross-motions for summary judgment relate to the request of the plaintiff — who was retroactively retired by the Navy for physical disability as of May 1, 1968 — that the court award him certain benefits in addition to the retired pay which the plaintiff has received for the period since May 1, 1968.
It is concluded that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact insofar as the issues now before the court are concerned, that the plaintiff has received all the benefits to which he is entitled under the law, that…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Dilley v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Stephens v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Finn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
- S.W. Aircraft Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1977
- Ray v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Kirwin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1991
- Dzialo v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
- Banerjee v. StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Ulmet v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1989
- Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2002
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.