Legal Opinion

F. D. Barton & Co. v. Turnbull

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 10, 1924No. Docket No. 112PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDonald, J.'

This is an action of replevin for the possession of 10,530 Norway and white pine logs. When replevined the logs were in possession of defendant, as sheriff, under a writ of attachment issued out of the circuit court for Luce county, in a cause wherein Erwin Yuill was defendant and one A. L. Sayles was plaintiff. In that cause judgment was rendered against Yuill in the sum of $4,710.28. The plaintiff claims title by purchase from Yuill. John C. Ross, trustee for the Bay City Bank, was the owner of the logs and land from which they were cut. He sold the premises, including the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Richardson Lumber Co. v. HoeyMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Sanford v. MillikinMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shipler v. New Castle Paper Products Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  2. Lloyd L. Hughes, Inc. v. WiddersWashington Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Novak v. FederspielDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API