Legal Opinion

Novak v. Federspiel

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided November 23, 2022No. 1:21-cv-12008Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN NORTHERN DIVISION GERALD NOVAK and ADAM WENZEL, Plaintiffs, Case No. 1:21-cv-12008 v. Honorable Thomas L. Ludington United States District Judge SHERIFF WILLIAM L. FEDERSPIEL, in his official and personal capacities, Defendant. _________________________________________/ OPINION AND ORDER STAYING CASE UNDER (1) PULLMAN ABSTENTION, (2) BURFORD ABSTENTION, AND (3) COURT’S INHERENT AUTHORITY, (4) CERTIFYING QUESTIONS TO MICHIGAN SUPREME COURT, (5) DIRECTING PARTIES TO SHOW CAUSE FOR WHY THEY HAVE NOT INITIATED FORFEITURE PROCEEDINGS, (6)…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Clinton v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API