Legal Opinion

United States Fire Insurance Company v. Warden

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 17, 1971No. 4477PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COLLINGS, Justice.

This is a workmen’s compensation case. The appeal is from a judgment based upon a jury verdict finding in special issue number one that Clarence Warden, deceased, was not a borrowed employee of Wheaton Van Lines, Inc. The right of appellee, Warden’s widow and children, to receive death benefits under the Workmen’s Compensation Act is not disputed. The controversy is between two insurance companies as to which is liable for such death benefits. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, hereinafter referred to as Liberty Mutual carried the workmen’s compensation cover age for Wheaton…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lewis v. East Texas Finance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Producers Chemical Company v. McKayTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  3. J. A. Robinson Sons, Inc. v. WigartTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Hilgenberg v. ElamTexas Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Remington Rand, Inc. v. Sugarland IndustriesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Thate v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Pape Equipment Co. v. I.C.S., Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  3. Associated Indemnity Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  4. Home Indemnity Company v. DraperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  5. Mayo v. Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API