Legal Opinion
TAUBMAN CHERRY CREEK SHOPPING CENTER, LLC. v. Neiman-Marcus Group, Inc.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided September 16, 2010No. 09CA2134PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Chief
Judge DAVIDSON.
In 1989, defendant, The Neiman-Marcus Group, Inc. (Neiman), entered into a long-term lease on a parcel of the Cherry Creek Shopping Center (the Mall) with plaintiff, Taubman Cherry Creek Shopping Center, LLC (Taubman). In 2009, a dispute arose between the parties concerning apportionment of property taxes. Neiman sought arbitration, contending that the dispute fell under certain limited arbitration provisions of the lease. Taubman filed a motion in the district court for a stay of arbitration under sections 18-22-205, -206, and -207, C.R.S. 2010, which the court…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Howsam v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- CONTEC CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v. REMOTE SOLUTION CO., LTD., Defendant-Counterclaimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Ad Two, Inc. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Lane v. UrgitusSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Vernon v. Qwest Communications International, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 2012
- State ex rel. U-Haul Co. v. ZakaibWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2013
- Crystallex International Corporation v. Bolivarian Republic of VenezuelaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Digital Landscape Inc. v. Media Kings LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2018
- American Numismatic Ass'n v. CipolettiColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.