Mayer v. Kane
New Jersey Court of Chancery
This is a bill filed by Charles H. Mayer against Samuel Kane and Sarah, his wife. The purpose of the suit is to have declared fraudulent and void two certain conveyances of real estate made by the husband to the wife through an intermediary.
Read the full summary
This is a bill filed by Charles H. Mayer against Samuel Kane and Sarah, his wife. The purpose of the suit is to have declared fraudulent and void two certain conveyances of real estate made by the husband to the wife through an intermediary. These conveyances took place respectively on the 3d of October, 1903, and on the 26th of October, 1903. The complainant is a judgment creditor of Samuel Kane, and has a judgment against him for four hundred odd dollars, which was obtained in 1904,- and under which an execution was issued and levied upon the premises in question. Heard on bill, answer and…
1Opinion of the Court
G-aurison, Y. C.
In 1869 Samuel Kane was married to Sarah Muller. She had been a servant up to the time of her marriage and had accumulated some money, and had in the neighborhood of $1,000 in a savings bank in the city of New York. He was a driver in receipt of $14 a week wages. They lived in New York City for four years' after their marriage. Beginning with the end of the first year there was a boarder in the family, and the wife received the money from this boarder.
In 1873 they learned of a piece of property, No. 101 Stuyvesant avenue, Jersey Citj1, which was for sale, and they came here to…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Feltham v. BlunckIdaho Supreme Court · 1921
- H. C. & W. B. Reynolds Co. v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1914
- Anderson v. CerconeUtah Supreme Court · 1919
- Hollander v. AbramsNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1926
- Vigne v. VigneNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1925
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.