Legal Opinion

H. C. & W. B. Reynolds Co. v. Reynolds

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 7, 1914PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Bibb Chancery Court. Heard before Hon. Thomas H. Smith. Bill by H. C. & W. B. Reynolds Company, against E. D. Reynolds and others, to declare and enforce a resulting trust in lands, with original bill in the nature of a cross-bill by the Bibb County Banking & Trust Company, to enforce its claim or lien against the property. From a decree sustaining the cross complainant, the complainant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

de GRAFFENRIED, J.

H. C. & W. B. Reynolds Company, a corporation, was, for a long time, engaged in a general mercantile business in Bibb county. The great bulk of the stock of the corporation belonged to H. C. Reynolds, Sr., and to members of his immediate family, among them being his sons, E. D. Reynolds and H. E. Reynolds, deceased.

-There appears to have been two mercantile establishments, one at Centerville and the other at Blocton. H. E. Reynolds, deceased, had charge of the business at Centerville, and E. D. Reynolds at Blocton. H. E. Reynolds, deceased, was the treasurer of the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Bicocchi v. Casey-Swasey Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Noble v. Moses Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  3. Garner v. Second Nat. Bank of ProvidenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. Allen, Bethune & Co. v. Maury & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  5. Ex parte GraySupreme Court of Alabama · 1908

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Zuniga v. EvansUtah Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Ex Parte ConradiSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  3. Switow v. SherSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  4. Schneider v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  5. Booth Fisheries Corp. v. EardleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API