Legal Opinion
Calfon Construction Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided October 18, 1989No. 792-87CPublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NETTESHEIM, Judge.
This contract case is before the court after trial. Each party has submitted a post-trial brief on the legal significance of plaintiff’s failure to supply written notice to the contracting officer of orders that it regarded to be constructive changes to the contract.
FACTS
The facts of this case were discussed in an earlier order denying defendant’s motion for summary judgment. See Calfon Constr. Inc. v. United States, 17 Cl.Ct. 171 (1989). The facts outlined on summary judgment are revisited below to the extent necessary.
On September 30, 1983, Calfon Construction Inc.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- J. D. Hedin Construction Company, Inc., for Its Own Use and for the Use of Fischbach & Moore, Its Sub-Contractor v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
- The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- J. L. Simmons Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
- Martin J. Simko Construction, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
- G.M. Shupe, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Miller Elevator Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Tecom, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Northrop Grumman Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2000
- ACE Constructors, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Conner Brothers Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.