United States v. Ernest Clark
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD, Chief Judge.
Ernest Clark’s string of bank robberies in the Milwaukee area attracted the attention of both state and federal authorities. When both sovereigns decided to prosecute Clark around the same time, the occasionally delicate practices designed to coordinate the timing and pursuit of state and federal prosecutions came into play. Though Clark does not contest the facts underlying his federal convictions, he argues that violations of the Speedy Trial Act and the Interstate Agreement on De-tainers require us to reverse his convictions. We conclude, however, that nothing was amiss,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Stanford v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Alabama v. BozemanSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- State v. HendersonNebraska Supreme Court · 2014
- United States v. J.C.D.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Melvin KnightCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2016
- State v. JenningsNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. TylerNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.