Botterbusch v. Preussag International Steel Corp.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
RUFFIN, Presiding Judge.
Reiner Botterbusch sued his former employer, Preussag International Steel Corporation (“PISC”), for breach of his employment contract. PISC subsequently moved for summary judgment, and the trial court granted the motion. The trial court also denied Botterbusch’s motion for partial summary judgment. Botterbusch appeals both rulings, and for reasons that follow, we affirm in part and reverse in part.
Summary judgment is appropriate when no genuine issues of material fact remain and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We review a trial court’s summary…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Baker v. Jellibeans, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1984
- Jackson v. FordCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Mayor &C. of Douglasville v. HildebrandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
- Harris v. Distinctive Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Savannah College of Art & Design, Inc. v. NulphSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hall v. RossCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Brock v. KingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- Trans-Vaughn Development Corp. v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- Horne v. J. H. Harvey Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2005
- St. James Entertainment LLC v. CroftsDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.