Jones v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
CLINTON, Judge.
Appellant was convicted of the offense of delivery of marihuana, and his punishment assessed by the jury at ten years confinement. The only issue at trial was identity. Appellant timely filed a motion for new trial in which he alleged, inter alia, “that there is new evidence material to the defense discovered, to wit: A witness whose identity and existence was not known to [appellant] at trial, and who would if located, testify that a person not known to [appellant] committed the offense.” See Article 40.03(6), V.A.C.C.P.…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Eddlemon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Bolden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1982
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Etter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Keeter v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
- Oestrick v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
- Saldivar v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
- Moreno v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1999
- Hackleman v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1996
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.