Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Hackleman v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)

Decided May 1, 1996No. 03-94-00076-CRPublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARL E.F. DALLY, Justice (Retired).

Appellant David Hackleman waived a jury trial, and after his plea of not guilty, the trial court found him guilty of possessing methamphetamine, cocaine, and marihuana. Controlled Substance Act, 71st Leg., R.S., ch. 678, sec. 1, § 481.115, .121, 1989 Tex.Gen. Laws 2230, 2936, 2939 (Tex.Health & Safety Code Ann. §§ 481.115, 481.121, since amended.) The punishment enhanced by proof of a prior felony conviction was assessed by the trial court at imprisonment for sixteen years.

ISSUES PRESENTED

Appellant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence and also urges…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Latham v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2000
  2. Blake v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2003
  3. Lemmons v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2002
  4. State v. Bradley, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998
  5. Arrick v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2003

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API