Legal Opinion
Stauder v. eCast Settlement Corp. (In Re Stauder)
United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 16, 2008No. 5-07-bk-51989PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
{Nature of Proceeding: Objections to Claims # 6 (Doc. #37); #8 (Doc. # 38); and # 9 (Doc. # 39)}
OPINION
JOHN J. THOMAS, Bankruptcy Judge.
The issues in this case have been the frequent subject of litigation in a multitude of bankruptcy courts throughout the country. In this Chapter 13 case, the Debtors, William and Kimberly Stauder, have objected to proofs of claim numbers 6, 8, and 9, all filed by the Claimant, eCast Settlement Corporation. The substance of each objection is that the Claimants have failed to attach sufficient documentation to the claim form to allow that claim to be accorded…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- In Re Herbert L. HOLM, Debtor. Alan WRIGHT, Creditor-Appellee, v. Herbert L. HOLM, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Heath v. American Express Travel Related Services Co. (In Re Heath)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Maxwell Land Grant Co. v. DawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Dove-Nation v. eCast Settlement Corp. (In Re Dove-Nation)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- In Re WHET, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · 1983
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re O'BrienUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- In RE McELWEEUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- McElwee v. Scarff Bros. (In re McElwee)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Cramer v. Indymac Bank, F.S.B. (In Re Cramer)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2009