Legal Opinion

Donlin v. Murphy

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 1, 2013No. 67823-0-IPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLau, J.

¶1 — John Donlin appeals the trial court’s dismissal of his shareholder derivative claims brought under CR 23.1 on the ground that he lacked standing to bring suit on behalf of an administratively dissolved corporation whose assets had been sold through a receivership. Because Jerry Murphy’s CR 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss was procedurally improper and because under the Washington Business Corporation Act (WBCA), Title 23B RCW, shareholder *291standing to assert derivative claims survives the administrative dissolution of the corporation, we reverse the trial court’s CR 12(b)(6) dismissal order and…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Haberman v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. DeHeer v. Seattle Post-IntelligencerWashington Supreme Court · 1962
  4. GRANT CTY. FIRE PROT. DIST. v. City of Moses LakeWashington Supreme Court · 2004
  5. Sea-Pac Co. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Local Union 44Washington Supreme Court · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Innerspace Floor Coverings, Inc., App. v. Janet L. Hill, Resp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  2. Chris Williams v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2020
  3. Jay Friet v. Katherine GaiserCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API