Legal Opinion

Sea-Pac Co. v. United Food & Commercial Workers Local Union 44

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1985No. 50103-3PublishedCited by 94 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUtter, J.

A motion for summary judgment brought by Local Union 44 of the United Food and Commercial Workers to obtain dismissal of an action brought by Sea-Pac Company, Inc., was denied by the trial court. We hold as a matter of law summary judgment should have been granted and dismiss the case.

Denial of a motion for summary judgment is generally not an appealable order, RAP 2.2(a), and discretionary review of such orders is not ordinarily granted. See Roth v. Bell, 24 Wn. App. 92, 104, 600 P.2d 602 (1979). It may be granted, however, where "the superior court has committed an obvious error which would…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Petersen v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Lamon v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Calbom v. KnudtzonWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Caruso v. Local Union No. 690Washington Supreme Court · 1983

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by94 opinions

  1. Hoffer v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Pleas v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Roberts v. DudleyWashington Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Douchette v. Bethel School District No. 403Washington Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Sunbreaker Condominium Ass'n v. Travelers InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1995

89 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API