Legal Opinion

De La Motte v. Northwestern Clearance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 26, 1914No. Nos. 18,640—(181)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action in the district court for St. Louis county against Northwestern Clearance Co. and Frank M. Kreidler to compel defendant company to issue to defendant Kriedler the number of shares of stock which he was entitled to receive from that company and to transfer the stock to plaintiff in accordance with the agreement mentioned in the opinion.

Read the full summary

Action in the district court for St. Louis county against Northwestern Clearance Co. and Frank M. Kreidler to compel defendant company to issue to defendant Kriedler the number of shares of stock which he was entitled to receive from that company and to transfer the stock to plaintiff in accordance with the agreement mentioned in the opinion. The separate answer of defendant company prayed that plaintiff take nothing by the action and the answering defendant have judgment against plaintiff that the 35 shares of stock theretofore issued to defendant Kreidler and held by him and plaintiff be…

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, C. J.

Action to compel the defendant, Northwestern Clearance Co., a corporation, to issue certain stock to defendant Kreidler, and to compel Kreidler to transfer the same to plaintiff. Defendants had judgment in the court below from which plaintiff appealed, having *199first moved for amended findings and for a new trial, which the court denied.

The facts disclosed by the record are in brief as follows: Plaintiff, defendant Kreidler and others, were associated together for the purpose of promoting and organizing the defendant corporation. Each agreed to become a stockholder when the corporation was…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lomita Land and Water Co. v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Wills v. Nehalem Coal Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Fred Macey Co. v. MaceyMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Battelle v. Northwestern Cement & Concrete Pavement Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  5. Holland v. SheehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Venie v. Harriet State Bank of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
  2. Dall v. JohnsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1949
  3. Faber v. EnkemaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1930
  4. Ennis v. New World Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Erickson v. BjertnessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API