Legal Opinion

American Cable Co. v. John A. Roebling's Sons Co.

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided May 22, 1933No. 5748PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justice.

This appeal is from a decree of the Supreme Court of the District of Columbia dismissing a bill in equity, filed under section 4915, R. S. (35 USCA § 63).

It appears that appellant Briggs was involved in two interferences in the Patent Office: Interference No. 58312, Briggs v. Sunderland v. Rairden v. Damon; and interference No. 58313, Briggs v. Rairden v. Damon. These interferences were dissolved on motions under rule 122, challenging the right of applicants to make the interfering claims, on the ground that they were unpatentable to any of the parties in view of…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hoover Co. v. CoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. BrennerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967
  3. Drackett Co. v. Chamberlain Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1936
  4. Ellis-Foster Company and Montclair Research Laboratories v. Union Carbide and Carbon CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1960
  5. Synthetic Plastics Co. v. Ellis-Foster Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1935

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API