Legal Opinion

Labenski v. Goldberg

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 25, 1996No. 14548PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpear, J.

The plaintiff appeals from the decision of the trial court denying her motion for an award of costs *867and attorney’s fees after she successfully challenged the suspension of her driver’s license by the defendant, the commissioner of motor vehicles (commissioner). The plaintiff requested fees and costs pursuant to General Statutes § 4-184a (b)1 after this court held that the commissioner had suspended the plaintiffs license without substantial evidence. In this appeal, she claims that the trial court improperly found that the commissioner’s decision to suspend the plaintiffs license, although…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. Department of Public Utility ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Environmental Defense Fund, Inc. v. WattCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  4. Federal Election Commission v. Political Contributions Data, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  5. Oakley v. Commission On Human Rights & OpportunitiesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Burinskas v. Department of Social ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  2. McDonald v. RoweConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  3. Nagy v. Employees' Review BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  4. Youngquist v. Freedom of Information CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  5. Raymond v. Freedom of Information CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API