Legal Opinion
Scott v. Rutherford
Supreme Court of Arkansas
Decided October 23, 1967No. 5-4333PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Conley Byrd, Justice.
Appellant, C. H. Scott, appeals from an order of the trial court sustaining the demurrer of appellee, Loma Beatrice Rutherford, to a complaint in ejectment.
The complaint as amended, together with the attached documents, alleges that appellant, through J. H. Mize, holds an undivided 1/5 interest in the lands involved. The allegation regarding the deed from appellee to J. H. Mize is as follows:
“That defendant has admitted execution of said deed to plaintiff’s predecessor in title; defendant has admitted acknowledgment of said deed conveying the lands described in the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Percifull v. PlattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
- McCrory School District v. BrogdenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
- Maupin v. GainsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
- Shreve v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- Jones v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
3Cited by2 opinions
- McKim v. McLineySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- McKim v. McLineySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971