Legal Opinion

Scott v. Rutherford

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 23, 1967No. 5-4333PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Conley Byrd, Justice.

Appellant, C. H. Scott, appeals from an order of the trial court sustaining the demurrer of appellee, Loma Beatrice Rutherford, to a complaint in ejectment.

The complaint as amended, together with the attached documents, alleges that appellant, through J. H. Mize, holds an undivided 1/5 interest in the lands involved. The allegation regarding the deed from appellee to J. H. Mize is as follows:

“That defendant has admitted execution of said deed to plaintiff’s predecessor in title; defendant has admitted acknowledgment of said deed conveying the lands described in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Percifull v. PlattSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1880
  2. McCrory School District v. BrogdenSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  3. Maupin v. GainsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1916
  4. Shreve v. CarterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
  5. Jones v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. McKim v. McLineySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  2. McKim v. McLineySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API