Legal Opinion

McKim v. McLiney

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 12, 1971No. 5-5512PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

465 S.W.2d 911 (1971)

Joe McKIM, Appellant,

v.

Jane Sutherland McLINEY et al., Appellees.

No. 5-5512.

Supreme Court of Arkansas.

April 12, 1971.

Davis & Reed, Springdale, for appellant.

Crouch, Blair, Cypert & Waters, and Wade, McAllister, Wade & Burke, Springdale, for appellees.

FOGLEMAN, Justice.

Joe McKim alleges that the chancery court erred in sustaining general demurrers of Butane Service, Inc. and Jane Sutherland McLiney, et al, Trustees, to his amended complaint, which the court dismissed. We agree.

McKim alleged that he was the owner of the lands described in his complaint, and that he acquired…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Towson v. DensonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  2. Morgan v. KendrickSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  3. Collins v. HeitmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1955
  4. Nelson v. Berry Petroleum CompanySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
  5. Rowe v. AllisonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. McCartySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1984
  2. Rabjohn v. AshcraftSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  3. Langston v. LangstonCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1981
  4. Woods v. WrightSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973
  5. White v. WhiteSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API