Jones v. Harris
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtJ. Seaborn Holt, J.
Appellants question the judgment of the trial court sustaining appellees ’ demurrer to their complaint, on the ground that it failed to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The suit was in ejectment.
All allegations contained in the complaint that are well pleaded must be presumed to be true. It alleged, in effect: “That it is a partnership composed of E. R. Jones and Lee Wilson & Company, a corporation, doing business as Delta Lumber Company, with its principal place of business at Blytheville, Arkansas. That it is the owner in fee and entitled to the immediate possession…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McAlister v. HarnessSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1913
3Cited by3 opinions
- Morrison v. CarruthCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2015
- Scott v. RutherfordSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1951