Legal Opinion
Helen Jeanean Burk v. K Mart Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 28, 1992No. 90-5244PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRORBY, Circuit Judge.
After examining the briefs and appellate record, this panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not materially assist the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 10th Cir.R. 34.1.9. The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.
Plaintiff-appellant Helen Jeanean Burk brought this action against K-Mart Corporation, alleging constructive discharge resulting from sexual discrimination and re taliatory harassment for whistleblowing. K-Mart moved for partial summary judgment on Appellant’s claims that she was retaliated against for…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Bacchus Industries, Inc. v. Arvin Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Alex John, Jr. v. State of Louisiana (Board of Trustees for State Colleges and Universities)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Burk v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Richmond v. Oneok, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Shaw v. AAA Engineering & Drafting, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- American Casualty Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1993
- Gilbert v. ShalalaDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1993
- Patricia Scaife v. Racine CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.