Legal Opinion
Burt v. National Republican Club of Capitol Hill
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 8, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2010-1911PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
ELLEN SEGAL HUVELLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff Trevor Burt claims that his employer, the National Republican Club of Capitol Hill (the “Club”), and his supervisor, Stanley Lawson, the Club’s General Manager (collectively, “defendants”), discriminated against him based on his race in violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”), D.C.Code § 2-1401 et seq. Burt is African American. He alleges that because of his race defendants did not compensate him fairly when he assumed the duties of Interim Executive…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brown v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Young v. Covington & Burling, LLPDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Burt v. National Republican ClubCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
- Burt v. National Republican Club of Capitol HillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Charon v. Anasazi Group, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.