Legal Opinion

Crescent Oil Co. v. City of Minneapolis

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 7, 1929No. 27,301PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHilton, J.

Appeal from a judgment enjoining the city of Minneapolis and certain named officers thereof from enforcing the provisions of an ordinance relating to regulating and licensing gasolene filling stations and wholesale gasolene and oil storage plants.

This case was before this court on a previous occasion, the decision being reported in 175 Minn. 276, 221 N. W. 6. It was an appeal from an order denying a motion for temporary injunction. But two questions were there involved: (1) Whether there was charter authority for the ordinance; (2) whether the ordinance was valid as a proper regulation in the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Mankato v. FowlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. City of St. Paul v. TraegerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1878
  3. City of Duluth v. KruppSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  4. Higgins v. LacroixSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
  5. State v. FinchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ramaley v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  2. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
  3. Olsen v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  4. Lyons v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
  5. Minnetonka Electric Co. v. Village of Golden ValleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API