Legal Opinion
Ramaley v. City of St. Paul
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 18, 1948No. 34,647PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Matson, Justice.
Plaintiffs appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to their complaint in an action for a declaratory judgment and injunction.
Pursuant to a license issued to them under city ordinance No. 7537, plaintiffs operate as “off sale” liquor dealers in St. Paul. The ordinance exacts an “off sale” license fee of $250 per year in conformity with M. S. A. 340.11, subd. 12(d), as amended by L. 1947, c. 528, which provides that “the maximum license fee for an ‘Off sale’ license in the cities of the first class shall be the sum of $250.”
In April 1947, subsequent to the enactment of §…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Armour & Co. v. WantockSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Youngblood v. SextonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Wiggins Ferry Co. v. East St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- State v. Carleton CollegeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
- Schmidt v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Ainsworth v. BryantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Camping and Education Foundation v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Minneapolis Street Railway Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
- Abex Corporation v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1973
- Ideal Life Church of Lake Elmo v. County of WashingtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.