Legal Opinion
Hunter v. Royal Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 5, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The following is the opinion of the court below:
Hinman, J.:
This action is brought to recover the value of an automobile that was destroyed by fire at a time when it was covered by an insurance policy issued by the defendant.
Decision was reserved upon a motion for a nonsuit at the close of the plaintiff's case and at the conclusion of the testimony. It is unnecessary to enter into any detailed consideration of the case because the solution of the motion is dependent simply upon the determination of the question, w'hether the plaintiff has failed to prove a cause of action against the defendant…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Higgins v. . Western Union Telegraph Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Stenzler v. Standard Gas Light Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1917
- Stenzler v. Standard Gas Light Co. of the City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Franklin Bank Note Company v. . MacKeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Franklin Bank-Note Co. v. MackeyNew York Supreme Court · 1895
3Cited by6 opinions
- Koury v. Providence-Washington InsuranceSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1929
- Fidelity Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Ballew-Satterfield Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Hardware Mutual Casualty Company v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
- Rash v. North British & Mercantile Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1951
- General American Cas. Co. v. Hill & Hill Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1954
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.