Rash v. North British & Mercantile Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
STANLEY, Commissioner.
The appellee issued a policy -of insurance to the appellants, automobile dealers, by which it insured them against loss or damage to a certain automobile caused by “collision or upset,” in the sum of $1,200. The car was so destroyed. The insurance company denied liability because of breach of a covenant as to the use to which the car should be put. The use, as stated in the policy, was that it would be “Held for sale.” Another of its terms -was that the insurance did not apply “while the automobile is subject to any bailment lease, conditional sale, mortgage or other…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Security Ins. Co. v. Sellers-Sammons-Signor Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Fidelity Union Fire Ins. Co. v. Ballew-Satterfield Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Taylor & Crate v. AsherCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
- Hunter v. Royal InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
- Cramer & King Co. v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1926
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Motors Insurance Corporation v. Safeco Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
- McKenzie v. OliverCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1978
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1967
- Hardware Mutual Casualty Company v. BakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968