Legal Opinion

City of McLeansboro v. Trammel

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 10, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Trespass on the Case, for personal injuries. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Hamilton County; the Hon. Edmund D. Youngblood, Judge presiding. Heard in this court at the February term, 1903.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Myers

delivered, the opinion of the court.

This was an action on the case by appellee against appellant, to recover for injuries received by appellee by reason of a defect in a plank footway or crossing in one of appellant’s streets.

The crossing in controversy was constructed of six two-inch oak plank, eight inches- wide, resting upon cross-pieces four or five feet apart. One plank, the second from the side, was broken a few inches from one of the cross-pieces, and also at the point of rest upon the cross-piece. The broken ends of the plank rested upon the ground five or more inches beneath the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. City of Chicago v. BabcockIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  2. City of Chicago v. McLeanIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hogan v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1897
  4. City of Chicago v. DalleIllinois Supreme Court · 1885
  5. City of Springfield v. DoyleIllinois Supreme Court · 1875

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Heath v. MansonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Kellett v. City & County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Simon v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1935
  4. Welch v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1925
  5. Courtney v. StateCourt of Claims of Illinois · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API