FFP Operating Partners, L.P. v. Love
Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)
1ConcurrenceCornelius, Chief Justice
I agree that the judgment should be affirmed, but I do so for different reasons than those stated in the majority opinion.
I cannot agree that merely advising the jury that the plaintiffs employer is a nonsub-scriber under the workers’ compensation law is improper. In the only two cases that have considered this question, the courts opined that it was not improper to do so unless the reference is used as an argument for the jury to punish the employer for failing to subscribe to the law or to overcompensate the plaintiff because she has not received collateral benefits that other workers…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Breckenridge Ice & Cold Storage Co. v. HutchensCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
- Great West Mill & Elevator Co. v. HessCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
- Pullman Co. v. RansawTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
- Railway Express Agency v. BannisterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Scottino v. LedbetterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.