Legal Opinion

Zibung v. Union Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided September 8, 1989No. 71403PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLIVER, Judge.

Respondent, cross-appellant, Robert Zi-bung (Zibung), was leaving his job at appellant, cross-respondent, Union Pacific Railroad Co. (Union Pacific), when he slipped and fell on their ice covered parking lot. Zibung brought a Federal Employers Liability Act (FELA) action against Union Pacific alleging that the ice covered parking lot constituted an unsafe working condition. The jury awarded Zibung $40,000. Union Pacific moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict alleging that Zibung had failed to make a submissible case. Zi-bung moved for a new trial on the issue of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Rogers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Burnett v. GriffithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1989
  4. Firestone v. Crown Center Redevelopment Corp.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  5. Phillips v. LivelyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Badahman v. Catering St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 2013
  2. Qualls v. St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1990
  3. House v. Missouri Pacific RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Wilson v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Rice v. BNSF Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2011

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API