Ag Pro, Inc. v. Bernard A. Sakraida
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
RIVES, Circuit Judge:
Ag Pro, Inc., plaintiff-appellant (hereafter plaintiff), sued Sakraida, defendant-appellee (hereafter defendant), for infringement of the D. J. Gribble, et al. (hereafter Gribble/Bennett) Patent 3,-223,070, titled “Dairy Establishment.” On the first hearing the district court granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment. This Court reversed and remanded for a trial on the merits. Ag Pro v. Sakraida, 5 Cir., 1971, 437 F.2d 99.
On remand the trial was commenced and completed on the same day. The district court received suggested findings of fact and conclusions of law…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Cuno Engineering Corp. v. Automatic Devices Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Hotchkiss v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1851
- Anderson's-Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Salvage Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Sakraida v. Ag Pro, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Professional Golfers Association of America v. Bankers Life & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Dystar Textilfarben Gmbh & Co Deutschland Kg v. C.H. Patrick, Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Republic Industries, Inc. v. Schlage Lock CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
- Louis W. Parker, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Motorola, Inc., Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.