Legal Opinion
In re J.A.
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided December 20, 1991No. Nos. 89-1352, 89-1353, 90-650 and 90-651PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Per curiam
On February 7, 1989, the District of Columbia government filed a neglect petition against appellant alleging, pursuant to D.C.Code § 16-2301(9)(A), (B) (1989 Repl.), that her two children were abused and neglected. At the conclusion of a bench trial, the judge found that the children were neglected and abused, and placed them temporarily in the care of their maternal grandmother. At a subsequent disposition hearing, the judge granted custody of the children to their father. The mother contends on appeal that (1) D.C.Code § 16-2301(9)(A) is unconstitutionally vague on its face, and that (2)…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Kaliku v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2010
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. KreamerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Talley v. VarmaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- Hechinger Co. v. JohnsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
- In re M.D.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.