Legal Opinion

Spiess v. White

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 17, 2001No. 98-04833-CV; CA A107333Published

1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, J.

Defendants appeal from a judgment foreclosing, for nonpayment of real property taxes, a trust deed under which they are the grantors and plaintiffs are the beneficiaries. Defendants contend that the trial court erred in determining that, before commencing the foreclosure action, plaintiffs reinstated defendants’ obligation to timely pay real property taxes owing against the encumbered property and to timely provide plaintiffs with proof of payment. On de novo review, ORS 19.415(3), we affirm.

The case was tried to the court on stipulated facts. Plaintiffs are real estate developers. In June…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Alderman v. DavidsonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Daly v. FitchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Salishan Hills, Inc. v. KriegerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  4. Gordon v. SchumacherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. Walker v. FeiringCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API