Legal Opinion

Niller ex rel. Hirschman v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided April 18, 1867PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal from tbe Circuit Court of Baltimore City. The facts in the case are sufficiently set forth in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the CourtCraik, J.

The appellant in this case filed her bill in the Circuit Court of Baltimore city, praying for an injunction to protect her separate property, which had been levied upon to satisfy a judgment against Conrad Hiller, her husband, in favor of the appellee, James H. Johnson. The appellant alleged in her bill that the goods and property levied upon were her separate property, and did not belong to her husband, Conrad Hiller, and was not answerable for the payment of his debts. The appellees answered her bill, denied the jurisdiction of the Court, but admitted that the property in controversy had…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cecil v. CecilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
  2. Williams v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1857
  3. Cox v. HillCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1854
  4. Bridges v. McKennaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1859
  5. Lewis v. LevyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1860

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Barrick v. HornerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1893
  2. Crise v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
  3. White Sewing Machine Co. v. GordonIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Warner v. DoveCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
  5. Arnett v. CoffeyColorado Court of Appeals · 1891

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API